|
TUNL vision
by Angela Spivey
om Clegg keys in the security code that sends the elevator down
to the big vault. The doors open, he clips on a radiation detector,
then he starts the tour in the NASA-like control room where a
technician named Paul chews on an unlit cigar. Darting through
doors, ducking to avoid pipes, Clegg leads the way through a
maze of metal cages, concrete walls, and endless wires. Suddenly,
he stops. He points out a towering sea-foam-green machine. This
green thing — it's called a tandem Van de Graaff accelerator — makes
the work happen. Here, work means hurling atomic nuclei at each
other to cause a reaction.
This is the Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL),
one of the largest university-based nuclear physics labs in the
nation.
Most of it sits underneath a parking lot on the campus of Duke
University. There, we said it — Duke. Three universities — Duke,
Carolina, and N.C. State — created TUNL in 1965 and jointly
operate it, sharing space, equipment, and resources. Clegg, professor
of physics and astronomy at Carolina, has been busting stuff apart
here for years.
Someone calls out a warning: they're turning on the accelerator. "When
the accelerator's on," Clegg says, "depending
on which beam is going, radiation levels can be high and you have
to be careful where you walk." Very basically, here's
how these experiments work. The researchers take a piece of thin,
postage-stamp-sized foil and coat it with some element — say,
silicon. This element — its nucleus, to be more exact — is
called the target. A machine called an ion source produces a beam
of ionized hydrogen protons — protons that have lost an electron,
thereby gaining an electric charge. Various lenses and steerers
direct the ion beam to the accelerator, which ramps the particles
up to the desired speed. "We send beams of particles at the targets," Clegg says. "Our
targets are other nuclei, and we bang them together really hard,
and shrapnel comes out. The shrapnel are pieces of the struck nucleus,
and how that stuff comes out tells us something about the forces
that hold it together."
legg is simplifying, of course. Dozens of machines — flux
meters, control boxes, dehumidifiers, compressors and filters and
valves — work together. Climbing atop a silver vacuum pump,
Clegg points out one of the red, plate-sized magnets that help
draw the beam where the scientists want it to go. And as Clegg
leads the way through the cages and pumps and wires, a continuous
roaring, a little quieter than a bus, comes from the many vacuum
pumps that keep air out of the beam line. If the ionized particles
hit normal air, they'd lose their charge and slow to a stop.
TUNL (pronounced like tunnel) has long been known for this tandem-accelerator
setup, which uses an elaborate array of ion sources and beam lines
to produce various types of particles and send them around the
vault to one of many target stations. For instance, in the late
1980s Clegg led a team of twenty students and faculty in building
an ion source that lets them control the spin orientation of the
beam particles. Protons, it seems, can spin either clockwise or
counterclockwise. "Each one is an extremely tiny magnet," Clegg
says. Knowing their spin orientation from the beginning of the
experiment allows control of the magnets' orientation. These
ions with a known spin are said to be polarized. Clegg's
ion machine is known as the "most intense source of dc (continuous
stream) polarized positive hydrogen and deuterium ions in the world." Other
ion sources at TUNL produce beams of unpolarized protons, deuterons,
and neutrons.
tudents
helped build much of this equipment. "This laboratory
has a reputation for training students to crawl around the apparatus," Clegg
says. When something breaks, a graduate student will probably fix
it. "They know how to solve problems as they arise," says
Hugon Karwowski, professor of physics and astronomy. Usually about
thirty grad students are working at TUNL at any one time. The lab
has produced thirty to forty Carolina Ph.D.s, says Ed Ludwig, professor
of physics and astronomy and the first Carolina scientist to work
there. Most students here work through entire experiments, from
building equipment to analyzing results. Clegg's, Karwowski's, and Ludwig's work has focused
on spin dependence in few-body physics, which means studying the
magnetic forces that hold two or three protons together. Protons
are charged positively, and, Clegg explains, positive charges usually
repel one another. But inside a nucleus, they stick together. "So
there's an attractive force inside the nucleus which is stronger
than the repulsive force of the charge," Clegg says. "What
holds nuclei together? What is the nature of that force?"
Since its early days, when most of the research focused on the
big accelerator, TUNL has continued to grow. When the whole group
meets, there is standing room only in the building's single
conference room. One of TUNL's newest additions — created
and constructed by Carolina scientists — is the Laboratory
for Experimental Nuclear Astrophysics (LENA) — one of only
three dedicated nuclear astrophysics (the nuclear physics of stars)
labs in the nation.
o Clegg finishes the whirlwind tour, hands you off to the LENA
guys, and disappears into the innards of the vault. Art Champagne
walks you to a separate building where he, Christian Iliadis,
and a group of students simulate the reactions that power a star.
LENA is another metal maze; walk in and you might find Johannes
Pollanen, who just finished his senior year at Carolina, trying
to find on which table beside which roll of tape and box of lugs
he laid his screwdriver. LENA is on a smaller scale than the
big vault, though, and the two accelerators (one of which is
painted purple) operate at high intensity (number of protons
hitting a target per second) but comparatively low energy — one
accelerates the beam over a difference of one million volts,
the other over a difference of 200,000. The insides of stars
work at accelerating energies much lower than that — 5,000
to 20,000 volts. But those reactions can take ten billion years,
so to study them the researchers create simulated reactions at
higher speeds, then use math to extrapolate the results to actual
stars.
While LENA's equipment is low energy but high intensity,
the people here are high energy and high intensity. Explaining
why they spend many of their days in this windowless basement lab,
Champagne, professor of physics and astronomy, says that our earth
is a mere side effect of a reaction inside some star billions of
years ago. "We're living on the debris," he says. "The
oxygen you're breathing right now was made inside exploding
stars." Such reactions happen constantly, and scientists
don't understand much of what drives them. "The universe
is a zoo," says Iliadis, associate professor of physics and
astronomy. Understanding these reactions better, they say, would
mean getting a clearer picture of where our universe came from
and where it may be going.
ately, scientists find that the answers to those big questions
have a lot to do with stuff we can't even see. Dark energy — a
force that we know nothing about — appears to dominate
the universe, according to studies published in the journal Science earlier this year. Scientists have suspected the existence of
dark energy because of how radiation and other energy fluctuate
at different places in the cosmos. The newest findings support
the idea that most of the universe — 73 percent — is
dark energy.
"Dark energy seems to act against gravity — it pushes things
apart rather than pulling things together," Champagne says.
Because of this anti-gravity effect, some scientists think that
the universe is expanding at an ever-increasing rate; galaxies
that are far, far away will only move farther, and they will do
it faster. And, what we traditionally think of as matter — stuff
that is made out of atoms — occupies only about 4 percent of
the universe. "Essentially, we don't know what our
universe is," Iliadis says.
Champagne, Iliadis, and Ph.D. student Bob Runkle may add a clue
later this year when they publish work in which they measure the
rate of one tiny reaction — and end up revising the age of
our galaxy by about 600 million years. The experiments, which Runkle
has been conducting for his doctoral dissertation, are complicated,
but like other projects at TUNL they involve using an accelerator
to hurl beams of protons at a target. In this case the target is
nitrogen 14; they shoot protons at it, over and over, for about
1,200 hours. "Since it's my experiment, I get to work
the midnight to eight a.m. shift," Runkle says. "Which
is why we have this couch over here." The researchers want to find out how often the proton fuses with
nitrogen 14. To determine that probability, they use machines that
detect gamma rays, which are high-energy radiation created by the
reaction. To home in on true by-products of the reaction and filter
out "background" (the natural radiation given off by
ordinary objects such as concrete), LENA is equipped with seventeen
detectors. "As many as we can afford," Iliadis says.
hat does this experiment inside a machine have to do with the
age of the galaxy? Collisions of nuclei — reactions similar
to those that go on inside LENA's machines — provide
the fuel for stars. "Tiny particles like the ones in our
accelerator control these stars that are thirty times as big as
our sun," Runkle says. "Isn't that ridiculous?"
As Runkle explains, some stars are compact cars (they burn their
fuel slowly), while others are SUVs (they burn it faster). The
slower the fuel burns, the longer the star lives. The rate at
which some stars burn their fuel is determined largely by the nitrogen
14 reaction, which the LENA team measured more directly than
had
been done before. They found that the reaction is less probable
than previous measurements had indicated, which also means that
the reaction happens slower than scientists had thought. Using
these data, the team can calculate how fast the same reaction
happens inside groups of stars called globular clusters. That reaction
rate tells us how fast the globular clusters are burning their
fuel.
he LENA calculations show that those clusters are burning fuel
slower than expected, which means that the clusters are older
than scientists had believed. "How long would that star
have to have evolved to reach this point?" Champagne says. "We
look at the star right now, and we look at its characteristics,
and we can work our way back." The galaxy can't be
younger than a group of stars in it, so revising the age of clusters
revises the age of the galaxy.
The LENA team hopes that once they publish this work, scientists
will use the new rate for this reaction to more accurately age-date
globular clusters. This new thinking about the galaxy's age
could change how we think about dark energy, because dark energy
affects how the galaxy (and the universe) evolves.
"This result is one part of a big picture," Champagne says. "But
it's something that's getting more and more clear.
I think over the next ten years, there are actually going to be
some hard answers about past, present, and future."
This research is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Look
for a future story in Endeavors about Carolina's growing
commitment to astronomy and astrophysics, which includes the completion
of the SOAR telescope in Chile and construction of the SALT telescope
in South Africa. Art Champagne is associate director of TUNL, along
with N.C. State University professor Gary Mitchell.
see accompanying article
Angela Spivey is the associate editor of Endeavors magazine.
[Email
Angela Spivey. Get
full contact info for Angela Spivey.]
|
|