|
The U.S. Golf Association (USGA) developed its handicap system to allow amateur players of differing abilities to compete against each other and have roughly an equal chance of winning. "It's a way to make the game more enjoyable for all players," Kupper says. After collecting and analyzing scores from 130 golfers at Finley Golf Course in 1997 and 60 golfers in 1994, Kupper and his colleagues showed empirically that poorer golfers are less consistent than better golfers. "Coupling this with some statistical theory on the way the USGA computes handicaps means that the poorer golfer gets a handicap that is less representative of how he typically plays than does the better golfer. So, if my handicap is six and yours is eighteen, I could give you twelve strokes and win roughly two out of three matches. In other words, the better player typically has a sixty to seventy percent chance of winning," Kupper says.
To make the playing field more even, Kupper recommends that the average of the 20 most recent scores be used to generate a more accurate handicap. Another possibility would be to use the average of all but the two highest and two lowest scores to compensate for unusually good or bad rounds. "With the current system, the more inconsistent a golfer is, the more his USGA handicap is overly optimistic about his average golfing ability," Kupper says. Since it would be difficult to get the USGA to change its long-held handicapping systembelieved to give players incentive to improveKupper says another way to make tournaments more equitable would be to have golfers with roughly the same handicaps compete against one another. Findings were reported in the February 2001 issue of
Chance, a publication of the American Statistical Association.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contents .......... back issues .......... browse .......... search .......... discuss .......... about us | ||