|
Working on this issue’s cover story, I found this sense of play—in every visit, every conversation. I have checked my notes. None of these nanoscience guys used the word “important.” All of them used the word “game.” So this is not a group that sets out to impress you. After all, we can
easily imagine how difficult the science must be—working at the scale
of individual atoms, wrestling with quantum mechanics and molecular chemistry
and such. These are the kind of people who say, “Hey, let’s have some
fun. Let’s mock things up with Play-Doh and ping-pong balls.” They enjoy
what they do and they enjoy letting other people in on the fun. Nobody
on this team needs to shout for attention. Washington is already watching.
Industry is already watching. And science is watching. When top journals
publish not only your faculty and your postdocs and your graduate students
but your undergraduates, too, you know the stakes are high enough.
No one needs to pump them any higher. One day last March, I had the pleasure of accompanying my teenage daughter to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. We had a lot of fun that day. I didn’t have to sell her on those works of art, or justify them, or estimate their value in dollars and cents, or expound upon how they would improve her life. All I had to do was to stand aside, to let her encounter the works firsthand, to watch them overwhelm and enthrall her. Enthrall us both. I would like to show her the pleasures of science in the same way. I wish she could stand and peer into a frame and watch a group of playful, passionate people reach deep into the dark unknown and illuminate something new. In this issue’s cover story, we will try to stand aside. Cover: Background, two carbon nanotubes on a graphite
surface, rendered by Mike Falvo using the nanoManipulator.
Clockwise from top right, Falvo’s image of layered perfluorooctadecanoic |