Nutritionally,

cannibalism
makes sense--
at least for the
tiger salamander.
So why can't we
stomach our
own kind?




LINKS

David Pfennig


Prions

Mad Cow disease
and other prion news


Were the Neanderthals
cannibals?

 


     

 


KinFood

by Brady Huggett

The idea of cannibalism tends to make people squeamish. The immediate reaction is usually, “I couldn’t do that.” But why not?

Scientists have puzzled over that question for a long time. It turns out that there are biological reasons why eating our own kind is taboo, not only among humans, but among most living creatures throughout the world.

David Pfennig, professor of behavioral ecology and evolutionary biology, uses cannibalistic animals to study kin recognition and disease transmission.

In his study of cannibalism, he found that the ability of an individual to recognize another as kin is important.

“There has to be a way for an organism to recognize relatives,” Pfennig says. “Biologists have now found kin recognition in a wide array of organisms. For instance, we see that primates can recognize their kin even in situations where these related organisms have never met.”

Pfennig explains that, in most cases, the sense of smell allows creatures to tell siblings from non-siblings, parents from strangers. “There have been interesting studies showing that in humans, if you give a small child a soiled garment of a newborn brother or sister, they can recognize the newborn as family,” Pfennig says. “They can literally smell it.”

Kin recognition can be learned in different ways. Animals can learn what they smell like from themselves, from their nest mates, or even from their environment. Later in life, if they smell those same smells again on another individual, then they will treat that individual as kin.

Even so, what can be gained by recognizing others of the same ilk and by helping those most like you survive?

An ant colony gives one answer. Worker ants do not get a chance to mate and pass along their genes to the next population. Why do these workers promote the health of the colony when they do not receive the one benefit that biology demands—ensuring their genes live on in the next generation?

In a way, they do receive that benefit because the worker is genetically related to the queen—she’s her daughter. If she cannot pass along her own genealogy, then the next best thing is to help the queen reproduce again and again. The worker passes along her genetic makeup through the birth of others like herself.

“If we think what’s really important in evolution is the ability to perpetuate your genes, then by helping relatives reproduce, we have an alternate way of aiding the survival of our genes,” Pfennig says. “If you reproduce, your kids would share half of their genes in common with you, so you’ve transmitted half of your genes into the next generation. But you could do the exact same thing in terms of number of genes by helping a brother or sister reproduce. As far as passing on your genes into the next generation, the two are equivalent.”

Recognizing kin and helping them survive strengthens the family’s genetic position in the population. But there is another reason why kin recognition, and the avoidance of cannibalism, is important.

“I started wondering why cannibalism is so rare in nature because it’s a great way of simultaneously getting a meal and getting rid of the competition,” Pfennig says. “Well, it turns out that cannibalism is also a great way to get diseases.”

A cannibalistic organism runs the risk of contracting lethal pathogens from the meal it just swallowed. “If a pathogen is able to infect another person, that means it is basically able to unlock the human immune system, and it’s possible that it is going to also infect me,” Pfennig says. “In general, I think we can predict that animals should avoid eating things that are very similar to them.”

And mostly, they do. Pfennig and fellow researchers conducted an experiment in which they fed cannibalistic tiger salamander larvae either diseased members of their own species or diseased members of a closely related species, the small-mouthed salamander. As a control group, they fed other larvae either healthy tiger salamanders or healthy small-mouth salamanders. The cannibals that ate the diseased members of their own species were less likely to survive to metamorphosis and grew significantly less than those that ate the diseased small-mouthed salamanders. Also, when given the choice between species members and non-species members, both healthy, the larvae chose to eat the non-species.

> NEXT PAGE: Brain soup?

 


© Copyright 2000 Endeavors magazine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All rights reserved.

What do you think of this story?
Let us know.