|
...the
nature we share
ake,
for example, the little round clumps of trees that dapple the savanna. Ecologists
found that these clumps of trees are about the same size and shape as the thorn-fence
corrals that herders use to pen up their animals and protect them from predators
during the night. Inside the corrals, the animals drop their manure and tromp
it into the ground, preparing the soil for the tree seeds that pass through their
guts. When the herders have gone, the thorny corrals remain, protecting the circle
of ground and giving the seedlings a head start.
"So what's really happening," Leslie says, "is that the animals
are transporting nutrients from all over the landscape and depositing them in
these corrals. And if you climb up to the top of a hill in Turkana, shortly after
the rains, you can see circular patches of green that are the same diameter as
these old corrals."
 |
.: In the dry,
harsh lands of Turkana, herds
help maintain the social networks families need to survive the inevitable disaster.
Photo by Paul Leslie; click to enlarge.
:. |
And Turkana people keep those big, scrawny herds for very good reasons. In
their culture, animals represent the collective wealth, not only of individuals,
but of families and groups. Borrowing and sharing are customary and expected,
and marriages demand a transaction of as many as 75 large animals such as cattle
and camels and perhaps 200 goats. These customs arose from an environment in which
people "count on disaster," Leslie says. A Turkana family knows that
drought, intertribal raiding, or livestock epidemics will almost inevitably wipe
out some or all of the family's animals. A network of shared obligations reduces
the risk of catastrophe for any one family, much as insurance does in Western
industrial cultures.
"What people are maximizing is not productivity but the probability of
persistence," Leslie says. "Under the circumstances, it wouldn't make
sense for them to have fewer, fatter animals because people wouldn't be able to
build those networks."
o
are the hungry animals denuding the environment and spreading the desert? No,
Leslie says. "What's controlling the populations of the animals is something
that's extrinsic to the system itself, and that's rainfall. When there's a drought,
and there's nothing for the animals to eat, their numbers get knocked down. Not
all ecosystems are like that, but a lot of the dry lands of Africa are."
Some of the studies were "endlessly entertaining to the Turkana,"
Leslie says. Ecology students followed the camels around, weighing their dung,
measuring the nutrients. Hydrologists studying water-percolation rates trucked
water into the dry bush with a Land Rover, dug a series of holes, poured a measured
amount of water into each, and then timed the water with a stopwatch until it
disappeared.
"So the Turkana guys are watching all of this," Leslie recalls, "and
they say, 'What's with this guy? How many times you gotta pour this water in there?
I'll tell you what's gonna happen, it's gonna disappear.'"
Leslie made a little more sense because he talked with people about things
that were important to them — why they took their animals here
instead of there, or why they had this mix of species in their herds rather than
having more camels.
hile
Leslie's team was studying the effects of people and their animals on the environment,
they were also interested in how the environment affected the people. They measured
growth and development in the children — height, weight, fatness,
and immune-system function. They also studied fertility to learn how the environment
might have been affecting the reproductive function of women and men.
"You assess that by measuring hormone levels at different times, and that
entails taking urine samples and blood samples, which can seem a little odd to
them," Leslie says. "If we hadn't already worked there for years, I
never would have been able to get the blood samples from them. As it was, it took
a lot of explaining to really make sure they didn't think we were doing some sort
of witchcraft."
Studies in Turkana and elsewhere have challenged the notion that fertility
is determined by social factors alone. Comparing nomadic and settled women, Leslie's
team found significant differences in reproductive function, some of which appeared
to be environmentally induced. "Among the most striking of our results is
an extraodinarily high rate of pregnancy loss among settled Turkana women, but
not among the nomads," Leslie says.
Work in this field, which is called reproductive ecology, is relatively new,
Leslie says. And not all social scientists are comfortable with it, or with any
other approach that would seem to imply that biology influences human behavior.
In some universities, disputes over such questions have split anthropology departments
apart, creating what Leslie regards as an unfortunate division between cultural
and biological anthropologists.
 |
.: Zebras
in the Ngorongo crater of Tanzania. For hundreds or thousands of years, herders
shared the savanna with wildlife. Photo by Paul Leslie; click
to enlarge. :. |
"Here (at Carolina) it is much, much better," Leslie says. "We
have people who do work on both sides. Sometimes there are tensions, but we still
like each other and go to the same parties, and we encourage our students to bridge
those perspectives."
hese
days, some of those students may wind up working with Leslie in Tanzania, but
Turkana is off limits, for now. The area has become too dangerous, racked with
ethnic and political violence. "Livestock raiders running around with spears
is one thing," Leslie says, "but when they've got AK-47s, that's another."
That's a shame, Leslie says, because during his 15 years in Turkana, he made
friends and earned the trust of the people he studied. He had also invested a
big chunk of his life, learning the people and the landscape, and mastering the
fine art of automotive repair in the bush. (He's spent untold hours under the
working end of a Rover, his legs poking out in the sun.) Things are different
in Tanzania, among the Maasai. The vehicles are more reliable. The land is richer,
better watered. And the people do not range as far with their animals.
But in Tanzania, the issues are even more urgent than they were in Turkana.
The Maasai and their way of life hang in the balance. Will they give up herding
and settle for farming? Will their health decline as they grow more sedentary,
more dependent on corn? Will their values and strong social networks decay?
"Tanzania is a wonderful place to work because it's spectacularly beautiful,"
Leslie says. "You drive to work through herds of elephants and zebras, and
it's just gorgeous. But there are serious problems there, and in some ways it's
very depressing to see what is happening to the people. They are bearing the entire
burden of the conservation efforts. They are losing their livelihood. And it's
all because they happen to be living where there are some pretty animals."
Leslie's research is funded primarily by the National Science
Foundation, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Neil Caudle is the editor of Endeavors magazine.
[Email
Neil Caudle. Get
full contact info for Neil Caudle.]
|
|