The Long Road to Rural
Health
story by
Elizabeth
Zubritsky
For rural health care
workers like Linda Boone, tracking down patients
is just the beginning. These days, there are new
problems at the end of almost every country lane.
Linda "Bird Dog" Boone always gets
her man. Or woman. Boone is a registered nurse
with the Northampton
County Health Department.
Some days she makes house calls to check on
people who aren't able, or willing, to make the
trip to the clinic. She might look in on them
after they've been released from the
hospitaldrawing blood, changing bandages,
and making sure they get enough to eat.
Sometimes, she makes surprise visits to see if
patients are taking their medicines properly. And
if patients aren't home when she arrives, she
tracks them down. She checks their usual
hangouts, stops by their workplaces, and talks to
their neighbors and friends.
"If I bump into someone I've been looking
for in the parking lot at the grocery store,
that's where I do my work," Boone says.
Only five primary-care physicians practice
medicine in Northampton County. That's one doctor
for every 4,000 people. The average in North
Carolina is one doctor for every 1,300 people.
And the county doesn't have its own hospital.
If you live in Jackson, the county seat, the
closest hospitals are 20 to 30 miles away, in
Roanoke Rapids and Ahoskie. The nearest major
medical center is in Raleigh.
If you own a car, it's not too hard to make
the trip to a medical center. If you don't, you
can wait for a van from the senior center or the
health department. But don't forget to call three
days in advance. And you'd better plan to spend
the whole day, because the van has to pick up
other people, too.
"Without a doubt, transportation is one
of the biggest issues for residents of this
county," Boone says. "The elderly,
especially, can't drive themselves and have to
pay to go anywhere. Many people rely on the van
service, but sometimes it drops people off before
the clinic opens. We come to work and find
mothers standing outside in all kinds of weather
with their babies."
Twenty-five years ago, the situation in
Northampton County looked even worse. In the
western part of the county, there were only two
physicians, both practicing part-time. Young
doctors simply were not replacing the older ones
as they retired. Nurses were nearly as scarce.
"There was a time when we couldn't
recruit nurses," says Sue Gay, director of
nursing and acting health director at the
Northampton County Health Department. She says
it's still hard to find specialty nurses. It took
about six months to hire a nutritionist.
But Gay says it is easier to find and keep
non-specialty nurses these days. A big factor in
that change is the local training of new nurses.
People who grew up in the area are more likely to
stay, and patients feel comfortable with them
more quickly.
Physicians who are trained in rural areas are
also more likely to stay there, says Thomas
Bacon, director of the Area Health Education
Centers (
AHEC) program and associate dean of the
UNC-CH School of Medicine. "In general,
physicians tend to settle where they are trained,
and that's in places like Chapel Hill or
Durham."
To train physicians in rural communities, the
AHEC program, funded by state and local
governments, created nine regional centers across
the state. Each center works with medical schools
nearby: Carolina, Duke, East Carolina, or Wake
Forest. Since the program began 25 years ago, it
has placed physicians in several underserved
areas. The Mountain AHEC, for example, has
trained 140 physicians, and more than half of
them have stayed in the mountains. There has been
similar success with nurses, dentists,
pharmacists, and other health-care professionals.
But training doesn't always mean rural people
learning from city doctors and medical schools.
The AHECs have their own faculty of local
professionals who teach health-science students
in a variety of fields. One goal of these
programs is to show students what rural practice
is really like, says Nancy Harrison, director of
nursing education at the Area L AHEC in Rocky
Mount. And some students decide to stay. Recently
Northampton County hired an obstetric nurse and a
pharmacist who both had done rural rotations
there as students.
The AHECs also help overcome professional
isolation, providing medical libraries,
assistance with computer systems, and continuing
education. The centers bring in experienced local
practitioners, such as Boone, to teach seminars
based on their first-hand knowledge.
One of the fastest ways to overcome isolation
is to link people electronically. A few years
ago, Northampton County began using a two-way
video conferencing system called
"telemedicine." The UNC-CH Program on
Aging set up the system to allow practitioners at
facilities in Northampton and Halifax counties to
consult with people at Halifax Memorial Hospital
in Roanoke Rapids. The researchers also use the
system, one of many in the state, to experiment
with different kinds of interactionssuch as
support groups and doctor-patient
consultationsto find out which ones work
well via video. Some elderly patients who used
the system to talk with doctors said they
preferred telemedicine because they had their
doctor's undivided attention and because they
didn't have to travel to an unfamiliar office,
says Mark Williams, director of the Program on
Aging.
Programs such as these seem to be making a
difference: While most of rural America is losing
physicians, North Carolina is holding steady.
Thomas Ricketts, director of the North
Carolina Rural
Health Research and Policy
Analysis Center at the UNC-CH Cecil G. Sheps
Center for Health Services Research, says
research done by the Sheps Center shows that
local training programs and professional support
make practitioners happier in rural areas. And
continuing education helps health-care
professionals keep up with the rapid changes in
rural medicine.
In North Carolina, one
of these changeable elements is the population
itself. An influx of Hispanics, as permanent
residents and as migrant farm workers, is adding
a language barrier. And more people are moving to
rural places once they retire, so the rural
population is aging.
But even more serious is the rapid increase in
AIDS. In fact, AIDS is increasing faster among
heterosexuals in the rural Southeast than it is
among any other population in America.
"I used to see a lot of tuberculosis
patients," Boone says, "but there isn't
much of it anymore. Now, it's AIDS."
Even AIDS is changing rapidly, Boone says,
from an acute condition to a chronic one. As
researchers come up with new ways to fight the
virus, people are living longer after being
diagnosed. UNC-CH was one of four medical centers
involved in clinical trials of a new three-drug
"cocktail" to stop the progression of
AIDS. The combination of drugs cut the number of
AIDS-related illnesses in halfa result so
promising that the National Institutes of Health
stopped the trials early.
But those kinds of medicines are expensive:
Some of the newer AIDS treatments cost about
$3,000 per month. And the rapid spread of AIDS in
the rural Southeast means the problem gets bigger
all the time. The health department doesn't have
the resources to provide all the residents with
the help they need, forcing Boone and other
practitioners to make some painful choices.
"We have to be careful about who we
select for those kinds of treatment programs. The
patient has to be committed," Boone says.
"Once the money runs out, that's it. Nobody
gets any medicine for the rest of the year."
Economics creates difficult circumstances for
doctors and hospitals, too. For some
practitioners, the main problem is making a
living. The patient population within a
reasonable distance is usually small, and,
although some rural people have good incomes,
many others are poor. Under those conditions, a
steep increase in costs can price a practitioner
right out of the market. That's what happened to
obstetrical care in the early 1980s. Many
family-practice doctors, especially rural ones,
stopped delivering babies after malpractice
insurance premiums jumped 500 percent.
"You simply can't spread around $15,000
in insurance premiums when you only deliver about
30 babies a year," Ricketts says.
The state has worked to counter such trends
and retain physicians in rural areas. The Rural
Obstetrical Care Incentive program, for example,
paid rural practitioners part of the difference
between the old insurance premium and the new
one. In exchange, the physicians delivered some
babies who were covered only by Medicaid.
Many practitioners don't like Medicare and
Medicaid because the programs don't pay rural
hospitals and physicians as much money as they
pay urban ones. The differential is based on the
assumption that health-care costs in rural areas
are lower because salaries are lower. But
Ricketts says the high turnover and increased
cost of recruiting in rural areas offset any
savings in salary.
Even when patients have insurance, rural
hospitals have trouble because they compete with
managed-care programs and with large university
medical centers.
"People equate technology with
quality," Ricketts says. "So they'll go
to a large urban hospital for a procedure that
their local hospital is perfectly capable of
performing. That `bypassing' is one of the
biggest problems facing rural hospitals
today."
It's not just the patients who make the
decision to leave their communities for
treatment, Ricketts says. It's the insurance
companies. Sometimes it's cheaper to go to the
big medical centers because they perform
procedures over and over. But it diverts money
away from the local hospital.
"That patient's going to want a local
hospital when he's had a car crash,"
Ricketts says.
Some small communities are keeping up with
changes in technology and competing with
managed-care systems by forming health-care
networks, Ricketts says. The Roanoke Amaranth
Community Health Group is one example. It was
started in 1972 by local physicians who allied
themselves with the hospital in Roanoke Rapids to
offer more comprehensive care. The same approach
has worked for Bladen County Hospital, whose
administrators worked with other hospitals to
create a network of services.
But even having health care available is not
enough. Sometimes patients see the doctor and
still don't receive adequate preventive care,
Ricketts says. Then people wind up in the
hospital for conditions such as seizures,
diabetes, dehydration, hypertension, which could
be managed elsewhere.
"Of course, people will have acute
episodes sometimes," Ricketts says,
"but if their care is being managed
properly, they shouldn't stay long or be in and
out of the hospital all the time."
To find out why primary care isn't always
adequate, researchers at the Sheps Center studied
areas where rates of hospitalization for such
illnesses were high and found that, although some
areas were under-served by doctors, others were
not. Sometimes, the system just didn't work well.
One reason, Ricketts says, is that rural
doctors are overworked. Research by the Sheps
Center has found that rural doctors see more
patients, work more hours, and are on call more
often than urban doctors. Once doctors get busy,
they slip out of preventive mode and into
illness-treating mode, says Timothy Carey,
associate professor of medicine.
One answer is to adopt an office-based
approach to medicine, Carey says. Studies by
Carey and Adam Goldstein, clinical assistant
professor of family medicine, found that simple
changes, such as giving the nurse the authority
to order a mammogram or attaching a reminder to
the patient's chart saying she will need one next
time, can be very effective. A project led by
Peter Margolis, associate professor of
pediatrics, will help rural pediatric and family
practices in North Carolina adopt a similar
approach.
"It's one thing to come up with a
solution in Chapel Hill," Carey says.
"It's another thing to know it works out in
the community, in places like Ahoskie."
Sometimes, lack of
education prevents people from getting the most
from their treatment. "Not too long ago, I
came across a situation where people couldn't
read their prescription labels," Boone says.
"They weren't taking their medicines
properly because they didn't recognize the word
`twice.' A lot of times, those of us who have
some education take too much for granted.
"But people won't always tell you things
like that," Boone says. "A person has
to have a lot of trust in you to admit he doesn't
know how to read or to show you a sore he's got
that won't go away."
A lack of trust can be a big obstacle for
minority patients, says Linda Mayne, regional
coordinator for the North Carolina Breast Cancer
Screening Program (NC-BCSP), an effort of the
Lineberger Cancer Center. The program, led by Jo
Anne Earp, chair of UNC-CH's Department of Health
Behavior and Health Education, is aimed at
reducing the high breast-cancer mortality among
African American women in the rural eastern part
of the state by encouraging them to have regular
mammograms.
"Some of the women feel `distanced' from
health care," Mayne says. "They don't
trust the system. Well, that makes sense once you
realize some of the experiences they've
had."
Mayne tells the story of a middle-aged African
American woman who, as a child, went to a
hospital because her grandmother was having chest
pains. "Every white person who came into the
emergency roomno matter how small the
injurywas seen first," Mayne says.
"Her grandmother was kept waiting all day.
Finally, she died of a heart attack, there in the
emergency room.
"That kind of discrimination is sometimes
hard for us to understand because it's
abstract," Mayne says. "For that child,
it was terribly real. That was her first
impression of doctors."
Some women also point to the Tuskegee
experimentswhen federal researchers allowed
black men to go untreated for syphilis in order
to study the course of the diseaseand ask
why they should trust doctors.
"The truth is, women respond better to
messages about mammograms when they come from
people the women identify with," Mayne says.
"We all do. The difference is that some of
us can identify with our doctors."
That's why the NC-BCSP uses a network of lay
health advisors to talk to women about
mammograms. The first lay health advisors for an
NC-BCSP sister project were trained by Eugenia
Eng, associate professor of health behavior and
health education, back in 1990. The women were
selected because people in the community already
trusted them and turned to them for advice. The
same concept is being used by the Sexually
Transmitted Epidemic Prevention (STEP) project
led by Jim Thomas, associate professor of
epidemiology. Rural eastern North Carolina has
some of the highest rates of gonorrhea and
syphilis in the nation, and the rates are
increasing most quickly among African American
women. Thomas teamed up with Earp and Eng to use
lay health advisors to teach African American
women how to protect themselves.
But the NC-BCSP work has shown that factors
other than mistrust can prevent African American
women from getting the care they need. The
biggest predictor of whether a woman will get a
mammogram is whether her physician refers her for
one, Earp says.
"African American women are less likely
to receive referrals," Earp says, "but
the disparity seems to be more a matter of
economics and access to care than race. Poorer
women or those without insurance or a regular
physician are less likely to be referred. Because
of that, African American women are
disproportionately affected."
Even when a woman receives a referral,
economics may govern her choices. A woman might
have to choose between paying for a mammogram and
buying clothes for her children, Mayne says.
"In that situation, not getting a mammogram
is a perfectly rational decision." Some
women tell Mayne it doesn't make sense to spend
$100 on a mammogram when they feel fine. It's
just looking for trouble. "It sounds like
they don't understand the importance of the test,
but there's really an economic factor underlying
that value," Mayne says. "What happens
if she finds out she has breast cancer?"
Many women don't have health insurance, so
even if they have good incomes, the hospital
bills can be overwhelming. Then there's money
spent on child care, transportation to a major
medical center for treatment, and lost wages from
taking time off work for chemotherapy. Mayne
points out that many coastal women are seasonally
employed as crab pickers. They can't take time
off work during the crab season because that's
their income for the year.
"Many women feel it's better not to know
there's a problem if you can't deal with it
properly," Mayne says.
Ricketts agrees that simply providing people
access to services is not enough. "If people
can't keep up economically," he says,
"if they don't have the education they need
to function, seeing the doctor regularly is not
where their priorities are."
For health-care practitioners like Linda
Boone, there's no time to wait for solutions to
the big issues of poverty, a lack of education,
and mistrust. The only practical approach is to
focus on each patient and his or her community.
In her words, "You learn from each person
the best way to help."
On May 23rd, Thomas Ricketts was named
Distinguished Rural Health Researcher by the
National Rural Health Association. uralHealth
Exposure to Farm Chemicals
Every day, farm workers come in contact with
and breathe dangerous agricultural chemicals.
Thomas
Arcury, senior research associate at the
Center for Urban and Regional Studies, is in the
first year of a four-year program to reduce farm
workers' exposure to pesticides, herbicides,
fungicides, fertilizers, and petroleum products.
Arcury and his colleagues are talking to farmers
and farm workers to find out what kinds of
interventionsdistributing educational
materials or providing washing stations and face
masks, for examplewill work best.
"Whatever intervention we come up with
has to be something that's good for the farmers,
as well as the workers," Arcury says.
"We have to understand that farmers are
businessmen trying to make a living in a
difficult economic environment."
For the next two years, the researchers will
study 36 tobacco and cucumber farms in eight
rural counties in North Carolina. They will test
safety measures on 18 of the farms and measure
the workers' exposure to chemicals when the
season begins and ends. To evaluate the measures,
researchers will compare workers' attitudes,
behaviors, and chemical exposure to those of
workers on 18 farms with no intervention.
Other Carolina researchers have addressed
similar issues. The PHARMS (Partners against
Hazards and Agricultural Risks for Migrant and
Seasonal workers) project, which ended in 1995,
found that many workers were unaware of how to
protect themselves from chemicals, says Eugenia
Eng, associate professor of health behavior and
health education. Only 13 percent of workers
surveyed wore socks while in the field, and only
four percent wore gloves. PHARMS trained some
farm workers as lay-safety advisors so they could
educate others. "Someone from the University
could never do what the lay advisers did,"
Eng says. An outsider would encounter problems of
trust as well as language and cultural barriers,
she says. "They inspired us."
Cancer
Everyone worries about cancer. But for people
in rural areas, the prospects are especially
bleak.
Cancer is diagnosed at a more advanced stage
among rural North Carolinians than among city
dwellers, reports a study by the Cecil G. Sheps
Center for Health Services Research.
The problem is compounded for African
Americans. Black males in rural eastern North
Carolina have a high rate of prostate cancer,
says Thomas Ricketts, director of the N.C. Rural
Health Research and Policy Analysis Center at the
Sheps Center. And although African American women
in that area get breast cancer about as often as
white women, the black women are more likely to
die from the disease, says Jo Anne Earp, chair of
the Health Behavior and Health Education
department.
Earp, director of the North Carolina Breast
Cancer Screening Program (NC-BCSP), and her
colleagues have been working to encourage more
black women in that part of the state to have
regular mammograms. The researchers have trained
a group of lay health advisorsblack women
in rural eastern communities who can talk to
others about getting mammograms. For women
diagnosed with cancer, there are "nurse
advisors" who can help them weigh their
options.
"Sometimes, women are overwhelmed when
they learn they have cancer," says Linda
Mayne, NC-BCSP regional coordinator. "They
may not be able to take in a lot of information
about treatment."
A study from the Sheps Center and the Bowman
Gray School of Medicine at Wake Forest University
has found that, in rural North Carolina, women
with breast cancer don't always get the most
effective treatment. Many women have surgery to
remove a breast but don't have enough
chemotherapy, Ricketts says. Simply providing
women with information about their options didn't
change the treatments they received.
The best approach to changing treatment seems
to be to work with both the patients and the
physicians, Earp says. Beating cancer takes more
than access to information. It takes teamwork.
Infant Death
For years, North Carolina has had one of the
ten highest infant mortality rates in the nation.
In 1996, only three states had higher rates.
The overall rate of infant mortality in the
state is 10 percent higher in rural counties
compared with urban areas, mostly due to
differences in mothers' ages, according to
research from Carolina's Cecil G. Sheps Center
for Health Services Research.
"Infant mortality rates are elevated in
rural areas among young African American mothers
ages fifteen to seventeen and among white mothers
ages eighteen to nineteen and thirty-five and
over," says Trude
Bennett, assistant
professor of maternal and child health and one of
the investigators who worked with the Sheps
Center. "These findings point to unmet needs
for teens as well as older women in rural
areas."
In the year studied, birth rates for women
ages 18 to 19 were markedly higher for women in
rural counties than for those in metropolitan
counties. For teenagers ages 15 to 17, birth
rates were equally high in rural and urban areas.
Rural residents tend to have high rates of
poverty and unemployment, low educational levels,
and poor health status compared with urban or
metropolitan populations, Bennett says. Rural
dwellers have less contact with physicians and
reduced access to appropriate specialty services.
"These are significant risk factors for a
number of health problems, including infant
mortality and low birthweight," Bennett
adds.
"The most important factor in preventing
infant mortality is getting premature babies to
neonatal intensive care units right away,"
says Milton
Kotelchuck, professor of maternal and
child health. "That's where some rural areas
are at a disadvantage. They just don't have the
same access to health care."
A Language Apart
One of the new barriers to rural health care
is language. From Christmas tree plantations in
the mountains to farms on the Coastal Plain, many
thousands of Spanish-speaking immigrants are
working, often with little or no health care.
Rural health centers must find Spanish-speaking
staff as they struggle to meet new demands for
services, often from those patients who can least
afford to pay.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Eight years ago, when Jim Thomas, professor of epidemiology, came to
Carolina, he began his studies of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) by
asking where the trouble spots were. He got the expected answers--Durham,
Raleigh, and Charlotte. Usually, STDs are worst in cities. But health
department officials also told him that rural eastern counties seemed to
have unusually high rates.
Thomas' sources were right. For the past several years, syphilis
and gonorrhea rates in some rural eastern counties have been among the
highest in the nation.
"It did not make sense," says Thomas. "Most of the research in this
field tells us that STD rates are highest in the city, but we had this
rural pocket where the rates were astronomically high."
That's when STEP, the Sexually Transmitted Epidemic Prevention
Project, began. Initially, Thomas and his colleagues--who include Jo Anne
Earp, chair of the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education,
and Eugenia Eng, associate professor in the same department--focused on
learning why the STD rates were so high in those rural areas.
The researchers found that some people were avoiding the local
health clinics because of a lack of anonymity.
"The problem is worse for men," Thomas says. "Women might go to the
health department for some kind of maternal or child care. But for a man
who isn't escorting a woman, there is only one explanation: He's there
because of a sexually transmitted disease. Just getting out of the car in
the clinic parking lot tells everybody his business.
The only way to prevent that is to go to another county, which
requires transportation and maybe even taking a day off work. Not
everybody can do that, so they just don't get treated."
Another factor was a lack of condom use. "There's a common
misconception that rural areas are free of sexually transmitted diseases,
so people think they don't have to be careful," Thomas says. "But nobody is
that isolated anymore. We found, for example, that about 20 percent of
the people in one rural eastern town had sexual partners who lived
outside the county."
To look more closely at that factor, Thomas and Rachel Royce,
assistant professor of epidemiology, and Bob Cook, a former graduate
student, looked for a link between syphilis rates and Interstate 95. Sure
enough, they found a connection. After eliminating race, age, gender, and
income, the one factor that many counties with high syphilis rates had in
common was that Interstate 95 ran through them.
"I-95 is well known to be a corridor for trafficking drugs from
Miami to New York," says Thomas. "That's one possible explanation. Some poor
women will trade sex for drugs, once they've run out of other resources."
However, Thomas is quick to point out that casual sex by itself
does not explain the high rates of STDs in rural areas. Many rural women
don't use drugs and have only one sexual partner.
"Previously, many people had assumed that the main source of the
epidemic was a prevalence of casual sex," Thomas says. "For many women,
that's not true. They are monogamous. The problem is the men often have a
side partner."
Obviously, one goal is to get men to change their behavior,
Thomas says. But it made sense to aim interventions toward women because
they have strong social networks and because, in the counties with high
STD rates, the numbers are rising fastest among African American women.
Thomas says changing the womens behavior isn't as simple as
telling them to use condoms, even in relationships they think are
monogamous. First, these topics are taboo, and women will not discuss
them with just anybody. Second, women need to know how to approach the
topic when talking to their partners.
"If a woman just tells her man she wants to start using condoms,
he might take away the wrong message," Thomas says. "He might think she is
being unfaithful."
To help deal with such problems, the researchers trained 20 women
in one community to act as lay health advisors. Those women were
perceived as "natural helpers"--women to whom others in the community turned
for advice. Through normal social interactions, these women talk to
others about condom use and encourage them to seek treatment if they
think they might have an STD. The system was modeled after one that Earp
and Eng implemented earlier in their breast cancer prevention program and
relies on input from a panel of community advisors.
Reducing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases in rural
areas is vital, Thomas says, because it's not just syphilis and gonorrhea
that are spreading. It's HIV, and, in the U.S., it's spreading fastest
among heterosexuals in rural southeastern states.
The advantage of the STEP project, Thomas says, is that it's not
an outside intervention. Change is lasting because it comes from people
within the community taking care of each other.
STEP is funded by the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious
Diseases and by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources.
|